Family Law Express
Get Your Free Account!
Menu  ▼
  • COURT DECISIONS
  • HOME
  • FAMILY LAW NEWS
  • FAMILY LAW BRIEF
  • FREE RESOURCES
  • FORUM
  • CONTACT US
  • Judgments
  • Guides
Fed. Magistrates Court
Federal Circuit Court
Family Court of Australia
Family Court of WA
Full Court of the Family Court
High Court of Australia
Social Security Appeals Tribunal
Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Supreme Court (All States)
Childrens Court (All States)
 
Fed. Magistrates Court
Federal Circuit Court
Family Court of Australia
Family Court of WA
Full Court of the Family Court
High Court of Australia
Social Security Appeals Tribunal
Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Supreme Court (All States)
Childrens Court (All States)
 
Fed. Magistrates Court
Federal Circuit Court
Family Court of Australia
Family Court of WA
Full Court of the Family Court
High Court of Australia
Social Security Appeals Tribunal
Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Supreme Court (All States)
Childrens Court (All States)
 
Fed. Magistrates Court
Federal Circuit Court
Family Court of Australia
Family Court of WA
Full Court of the Family Court
High Court of Australia
Social Security Appeals Tribunal
Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Supreme Court (All States)
Childrens Court (All States)
 
Fed. Magistrates Court
Federal Circuit Court
Family Court of Australia
Family Court of WA
Full Court of the Family Court
High Court of Australia
Social Security Appeals Tribunal
Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Supreme Court (All States)
Childrens Court (All States)
 
 
   

Search by FreeSearch | Catchwords | Judicial Officer | Case Title | Legislated Cited | Cases Cited

   
    Keyword Tags  taxable income


Full Court of the Family Court of Australia emblem
1: Yip & Wreford and Anor [2015] FamCAFC 21 | February 19, 2015
Court or Tribunal: Full Court of the Family Court of Australia
Catchwords: Appeal, Child Support, Departure Determination
Judges:  May JStrickland JThackray CJ

Background: The appellant father in this case sought a review of a child support departure determination and a subsequent Social Security Appeals Tribunal decision which both determined an increased taxable income for child support purposes. The father’s appeal to the Federal Circuit Court on this matter was dismissed and the father now seeks to appeal that decision. 
 
  [Legal Issue]This was an application for leave to appeal from the dismissal of an appeal from the Social Security Appeals Tribunal which increased the appellant’s taxable income for child support purposes. The application was dismissed with costs. In its judgment, the court analysed and determined a number of significant questions of law arising out of the interpretation of the Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989 (Cth) which would be of interest to family law specialists.   [Court Orders]The appeal application was dismissed. The Court found no error in law by failing to refer to s 117(7A) of the Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989 (Cth). No issue of procedural fairness arises – Application for leave to appeal dismissed – Appellant father ordered to pay costs.     



Follow @familylawxpress

STAY INFORMED

Please wait...
You are successfully subscribed!
There was an error with subscription attempt.

Family Law Caselaw

  •  Category List
  •  by Keyword Tags
  •  by Cited Experts
  •  by ICL's
  •  by Judicial Officer
  •  by Mental Disorders
  •  by Decisions Outcomes
  •  by Most Recent Decisions
join our family law forum

Courts & Tribunals

Categories

open all | close all

Most Common Keywords

appeal parental responsibility unacceptable risk sole parental responsibility succession child support financial agreement False Allegations Property de facto relationship Relocation Family Consultant Child Support Registrar meaningful relationship family provision Independent Children’s Lawyer binding financial agreement Inheritance child abuse DOCS pre-nuptial agreement Child Support Agency parenting orders spousal maintenance binding financial agreements Centrelink duress domestic relationship percentage of care Social Security Appeals Tribunal

Most Popular Decisions this Hour

  • Goode & Goode [2006] FamCA 1346 Goode & Goode [2006]... The judgment of Goode makes it clear that no longer are the best interests of the child necessarily... 7,420 views
  • Helbig & Rowe [2015] FamCA 146 Helbig & Rowe [2015]... The mother has made serious allegations of child sexual abuse by the father against a child of the m... 3,336 views
  • Mitchell & Mitchell [2014] FCCA 2526 Mitchell & Mitchell... The father has conceded that he has denied the children their right to a meaningful relationship wit... 3,271 views
  • Taxonomy List Taxonomy List 1,947 views
  • Thorne & Kennedy [2015] FCCA 484 Thorne & Kennedy [20... Just prior to their wedding, the couple signed a pre-nuptial agreement. Soon after the wedding, the... 1,910 views
  • Wands & Vine [2015] FCCA 221 Wands & Vine [2015]... The mother was found to have contravened the Orders and obstructed contact between the child and the... 1,729 views
  • Carpenter & Carpenter (No. 2) [2012] FamCA 1005 Carpenter & Carpente... FAMILY LAW – CHILDREN – where the mother alleges the father poses an unacceptable risk of sexual har... 1,685 views
  • Ridgely & Stiller [2014] FCCA 2668 Ridgely & Stiller [2... A judge recently took the “drastic step” of ordering that a girl, eight, who had lived with her moth... 1,535 views
  • Kennon v Spry; Spry v Kennon [2008] HCA 56 Kennon v Spry; Spry v Ken... Family law – Courts having jurisdiction in matrimonial causes – Powers – Jurisdiction under s 79(1)... 1,430 views
  • Ellison and Anor & Karnchanit [2012] FamCA 602 Ellison and Anor & K... On 18 March 2011, accompanied by his wife Ms Solano, Mr Ellison brought two eight week old children... 1,371 views

Copyright 1999-2012 © Family Law Express, All Rights Reserved.Privacy Policy|Terms and Conditions|